ENGLISH
FOR
CONGRESS POSITION PAPER (Revised January 2012)
The
Civil Service Reform Act of 1976 abolished the GS-16, GS-17, and
GS-18 super-grades and replaced them with five levels of Senior
Executive Service (SES) political appointees that could be
replaced at will because they were considered to be professional
managers, not subject to the job protections and restrictions of
the civil service. The rationale for establishing the SES
program was to make Federal agency managers more responsive to
the direction and mandates of their political
overseers. In that respect, the SES has far exceeded
the expectations of the framers of the program, but only at the
hidden cost of truncating the promotion opportunities for career
civil servants with the attendant loss of institutional memory
and management competence which maintains coherence and internal
stability in the day-to-day operation of Federal agencies and
conduct of their programs.
These management failures are very troubling in those
agencies responsible for oversight of industries directly
affecting public health and safety.
The history of the Federal civil service since the establishment
of the SES has been characterized by continuing failures of
government to protect the public safety. The airline crash
in Florida a number of years ago was directly attributable to
the FAA's management failure to implement the National
Transportation Safety Board's recommendation to install fire
suppression systems in the cargo compartments of passenger
aircraft. The 2011 crash of a contractor operated
commuter airliner near Buffalo indicates that FAA oversight
failures are still causing loss of life. The Katrina disaster
fiasco on the Gulf coast revealed to the entire world the
collective incompetence of all the government agencies involved,
but most seriously those of the Federal government. Recent revelations of
continuing Federal oversight failures in other industries are
very troubling.
The Congress should establish an independent commission of
unbiased experienced professional managers and management
experts to fully investigate and evaluate the history and
efficacy of the Senior Executive Service. It must prepare
a comprehensive report of its findings and recommendations for
future Congressional attention. Specifically, the
Commission should investigate whether the current practice of
bringing in outside management with little or no management
experience at the highest levels of Federal agencies is
advisable given the serious health and safety enforcement
failures of the past 30 years of political appointments to
senior management levels of Federal agencies.
Return to home
page
________________________
Designed by Imad-ad-Dean,
Inc.