ENGLISH FOR SENATE POSITION PAPER ON:

Hunting, Fishing, and Camping

As a person who spends most of each Summer camping and hiking on Federal lands and occasionally fishing in Federal waters in the Rocky Mountain states, I have become very familiar with the recreational management policies affecting the public users of Federal lands (National Parks, National Forests, Bureau of Land Management Lands, etc.).  Well over half of the total land area in the Mountain Time Zone is owned by the Federal government.  User fees for park admission and camping in all Federal campgrounds have escalated much more rapidly during the past thirty years than increases in the minimum wage, which severely punishes low income families desiring to take inexpensive vacations on Federal lands.  Admissions fees are now almost twice the Federal minimum wage: forty years ago they were about the same.  Some overnight Federal campground fees are almost four times the minimum wage now: they were much lower than the minimum wage 40 years ago. In addition, daily trail user fees are now being imposed for many hiking trails that originate at park or recreational area boundaries.

Non-resident U. S. citizens who wish to hunt or fish on Federal lands in these states also are subjected to extortionate short term hunting and fishing fees imposed by state Game and Fish Departments.  A one day non-resident fishing permit in Wyoming cost $15 per person daily in 2005.  Non-resident license fees for hunting on Federal lands are even more outrageous, often well exceeding $100 plus the substantial added cost of any special  big game permit.  In situations where a lottery is held to draw a limited number of permits for hunting certain big game species, non-residents are flagrantly discriminated against and often excluded from the lottery even though the habitat of the big game species involved is solely limited to Federal lands.  These same states receive hundreds of millions of dollars from timber sales held annually on Federal lands, yet they continue to discriminate against U. S. citizens living in other states that desire to hunt or fish on these same lands.  Public support of natural resource conservation and preservation  for our Federal lands ultimately depends upon widespread public benefit from access and use of these lands and waters.  As more citizens are excluded from their enjoyment by ever-increasing user fees, public support for these programs will gradually diminsh as more citizens realize that they cannot also share the benefits from the recreational use of these areas. 

I propose that the Congress pass legislation implementing the sale of Federal hunting and fishing licenses at nominal fees to all U. S. citizens.  These licenses would be used only on or within Federally-owned lands and waters.  If the states affected wish to participate in this Federal initiative, 90% of the fees collected from Federal license sales in would be remitted to the participating states' according to a formula based upon the amount of Federal land in each state and the level of state expenditures for wildlife conservation programs.  They would be designated only for funding wildlife conservation efforts with the provision that non-residents be permitted to hunt or fish anywhere in that state on the same basis as that state's residents, without discrimination or special exception.   In addition, for all citizens who file income tax returns with incomes below the poverty level,  the IRS would be instructed to mail a special Federal recreational user certificate valid until September 30th of the following calendar year.  These individually named Federal recreational certificates would provide to their poverty level income recipients free admission to all Federal historical parks and recreational facilities with a $1.00 maximum charge per night for campground occupancy.   For families with incomes between the poverty level and twice that amount, 50 % discounts for admissions and other fees would be provided using the same mechanism.  Why not give the poor some fee (aka disguised tax) relief?  The wealthy continue to get more tax cuts every year whether needed or not!


Return to home page
________________________
Designed by Imad-ad-Dean, Inc.